Banwell Report
Commissioned in 1962, in the same year that the Emmerson Report was published (Survey of Problems Before the Construction Industries), the Banwell Report ‘The Placing and Management of Contracts for Building and Civil Engineering Work’ was published in 1964. It was prepared by a committee headed by Sir Harold Banwell and including leading industry figures from Taylor Woodrow Construction, Trollope & Colls, Sir Alexander Gibb & Partners and others.
The report focussed on team relationships, construction contracts and other construction documentation (notably bills of quantities). It looked in detail at the traditional separation between design and construction and criticised the industry for having entrenched positions and operating with a lack of speed and purpose.
The report questioned why there was one form of contract for building, a different form for civil engineering and still another for government work. It recommended instead the eventual creation of a common form of contract for building and civil engineering.
Significantly the report recommended the sharing of feedback by anonymously listing prices submitted as a record to be shared with all firms that have tendered. This does not presume appointment based on the lowest bid, nor does it disclose identities but it does help bid managers to keep their pricing more competitive.
The recommendations of the report were adopted by many Local Authorities although not taken up by the Ministry of Works, and action on contracts was not supported by industry bodies such as the Joint Contracts Tribunal and the Civil Engineering Conditions of Contract Standing Joint Committee.
In 1967, the Potts Report was launched, apparently to try to implement some of the findings of the Banwell Report (Potts Report, Action on the Banwell Report: A Survey of the Implementation of the Recommendations of the Committee under the Chairmanship of Sir Harold Banwell on the Placing and Management of Contracts. Economic Development Committee for Building of the National Economic Development Office).
Meanwhile, on the ground, practice continues to be driven by market forces rather than government reports because the industry's culture is so set in the habit of lowest price appointments. Having said that, Banwell's suggestion of publishing all prices submitted by participating firms is an excellent way to encourage fairer competition and was successfully adopted by many local authorities. Future improvements can only occur if the findings of research are better promoted by leading bodies such as ICE, RIBA, RICS and CIOB...
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Cyber Security in the Built Environment
Protecting projects, data, and digital assets: A CIOB Academy TIS.
Managing competence in the built environment
ITFG publishes new industry guide on how to meet the ICC principles.
The UK's campaign to reduce noise pollution: Mythbusting, articles and topic guides.
Setting Expectations on Competence Management
Industry Competence Committee.
New Scottish and Welsh governments
CIOB stresses importance of construction after new parliament elections.
The sad story of Derby Hippodrome
An historic building left to decay.
ECA, JIB and JTL back Fabian Society call to invest in skills for a stronger built environment workforce.
Women's Contributions to the Built Environment.
Calls for the delayed Circular Economy Strategy
Over 50 leading businesses, trade associations and professional bodies, including CIAT, and UKGBC sign open letter.
The future workforce: culture change and skill
Under the spotlight at UK Construction Week London.
A landmark moment for postmodern heritage.
A safe energy transition – ECA launches a new Charter
Practical policy actions to speed up low carbon adoption while maintaining installation safety and competency.
Frank Duffy: Researcher and Practitioner
Reflections on achievements and relevance to the wider research and practice communities.
The 2026 Compliance Landscape: Fire doors
Why 'Business as Usual' is a Liability.
Cutting construction carbon footprint by caring for soil
Is construction neglecting one of the planet’s most powerful carbon stores and one of our greatest natural climate allies.
ARCHITECTURE: How's it progressing?
Archiblogger posing questions of a historical and contextual nature.
Comments
To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page.
It is a bit of a shame the last sentence is slightly ambiguous. Readers not having been immersed in the subject for years might read it as being a good thing!
KS
I edited the last sentence that KS refers to so that it is no longer ambiguous and added remarks that the reports findings were successfully adopted by many Local Authorities. Particularly useful was Banwell's recommendation to anonymously share all prices received with the participating bidders so that they could improve competitiveness and market share.
TC